Subject:
|
Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:42:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
664 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
John Barnes wrote:
> Even if Lego withdrew 50% of Technic parts, Technic would still be a richer
> "medium" to work in than Knex IMHO.
Or maybe we should take a look at Fisher Technic ?
Stef
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ?
|
| Even if Lego withdrew 50% of Technic parts, Technic would still be a richer "medium" to work in than Knex IMHO. I'm not sure why people are so worried about Technic going away. The name is obviously obsolete - I think it's a poor name in the current (...) (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
18 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (The Gaff) (13-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -Mitchell Lichtenberg (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (The Gaff) (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -Rob Hendrix (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -John Barnes (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -Jack Gregory (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![RE: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -Marco Correia (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (The Gaff) (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![RE: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -Marco Correia (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Steve Baker) (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![RE: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -Marco Correia (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Modular advanced RCX - yes, it's called JCX -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -John Barnes (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Steve Baker) (14-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -Allan Bedford (15-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Steve Baker) (15-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? -Allan Bedford (15-Nov-02 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|