To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 18387
18386  |  18388
Subject: 
Re: intro and question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:58:08 GMT
Viewed: 
759 times
  
Hi, I have your 1.0/1.5 book and just got around to looking at the CD. Does the 2.0 book contain new
items? Are there pix of the Construction Techniques chapter of the book on the CD or web? Those
would be very handy for teaching a robotics class.

Dave Baum wrote:

In article <3.0.6.32.20020616134215.007b8990@pop6.sympatico.ca>,
lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Laura O'Grady) wrote:

So now I am considering purchasing either "Dave Baum's Definitive Guide to
LEGO Mindstorms" to learn NQC or "Core LEGO MINDSTORMS Programming: Unleash
the Power of the Java Platform" by Brian Bagnall to learn JAVA.   I just
ran a quick search and found this interesting article called
"Ada/Mindstorms 3.0: A Computational Environment for  Introductory Robotics
and Programming" (found at
http://www.faginfamily.net/barry/Papers/IEEERA.htm).  In this article the
author advises that NQC is difficult for the novice programmer to learn and
use.

So now I am concerned about going the NQC route.  Maybe I should try this
Ada/Mindstorms software.  Any thoughts?  Also what is the relationship
between RcxCC and NQC? Thanks.

The paper you refer to cites two basic reasons why he considers NQC
difficult for novices: poor error messages and a command line interface.

The first criticism is true, and probably not going to be remedied
anytime soon.  Most people get the hang of it soon enough and learn what
to look for when the compiler yells "syntax error".  To be honest, the
couple of times that I have run NQC sessions for kids I have been
surprised at how fast they pick it up.

The second criticism isn't true for Windows or Macintosh.  Other people
have stepped up and provided GUIs for NQC on those platforms.  The first
one was RcxCC, which was later renamed to BricxCC.  It is the most
popular GUI for NQC, and the one I suggest that people start with.

Dave

p.s.  And of course buy my book :)

--
      Wayne T. Watson (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N, 2,701 feet), Nevada City, CA

                   "Hell is truth seen too late."  -- John Locke

                        Web Page: <home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews>
           Imaginarium Museum: <home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews/imaginarium.html>



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: intro and question
 
(...) Consider the 2nd edition more of a "refresh" of the 1st edition rather than lots of new material. Most of the update has been with respect to RCX Code getting a lot better with 2.0. These new programs will be availble for download, so even (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: intro and question
 
(...) The paper you refer to cites two basic reasons why he considers NQC difficult for novices: poor error messages and a command line interface. The first criticism is true, and probably not going to be remedied anytime soon. Most people get the (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)

21 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR