Subject:
|
RE: intro and question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:29:21 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
<rhempel@{spamless}bmts.com>
|
Viewed:
|
730 times
|
| |
|
|
Dean Hystad wrote:
> Forth is an amazing language. It's really small and runs on everthing.
> When I was first learning Forth I was confused by all the different
> dialects. Then I found out they were all the same language, but had been
> modified by the programmer to better fit the application domain. A computer
> language that I could modify myself!!! I was really hooked (I fell in love
> with LISP for the same reason). But I don't think Forth is right for
> everyone. The programs can be hard to read. You kind of have to pretend
> you are the computer and execute them in your head. Oh, did I forget to
> mention that it is a stack based language and everything looks like it's in
> RPN (Reverse Polish Notation). If you like HP calculators you may like Forth.
Dean, all of these points are valid. I first learned to program on my HP-41CV
calculator, which is a wierd mix of Forth and Assembler.
In the end, the deep knowledge of what's happening at the chip level makes
me a much better and versatile programmer today - but Forth is not for
everyone.
Come to think of it, programming is not for everyone...
Thanks for the kind words.
Cheers, Ralph
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: intro and question
|
| (...) Robolab is a wonderful tool for working with the RCX. I agree that the interface is unusual, but it accurately reflects the way that National Instruments (creator of LabView, the father of Robolab) views the world. They see everything as a (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
