Subject:
|
Re: intro and question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 18:17:34 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Matt Lawrence <matt@technoronin.com%stopspam%>
|
Viewed:
|
585 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Steve Baker wrote:
> Forth isn't by any stretch of the imagination a good language to
> learn as your *first* language - although it *is* pretty cool for
> writing embedded system software on teeny-tiny processors once you
> grok the whole programming thing.
There's been enough research to suggest that Forth is an excellent first
language that I would disagree. As a second or third language, there's
much more to unlearn.
-- Matt
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: intro and question
|
| (...) Forth isn't by any stretch of the imagination a good language to learn as your *first* language - although it *is* pretty cool for writing embedded system software on teeny-tiny processors once you grok the whole programming thing. ---...--- (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
