Subject:
|
RE: software-controlled motors
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 May 2002 11:21:00 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Marco Correia <marco@soporcel.SPAMCAKEpt>
|
Reply-To:
|
<[marco@soporcel.]Spamcake[pt]>
|
Viewed:
|
2297 times
|
| |
|
|
This modular RCX ideia is perfect, very LEGOish in did :)
> Steve Baker Sent Monday, May 13, 2002 10:05 PM
> I think it's a shame that Lego didn't go this route in the
> first place.
> The whole unexpandable rigid 'RCX' concept is quite contrary to what
> makes Lego fun.
<OFF-TOPIC>
IMHO, TLC isn't thinking "LEGO" anymore... It lost the main original ideia
that made LEGO look so logic, modular and limitless (and fun).
The ideia behind the newer sets (or idea implementations/solutions) look
more and more like just any other *NORMAL* toy maker.
Jack Stone reminds me of Playmobil :(
Bionicles reminds me of Transformers or any other weird action figures...
oh well...
</OFF-TOPIC>
Anyway, Mindstorms/Robotics-wise let's hope the new Spybotics are at least
RCX compatible (controllable) through IR.
mc.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: software-controlled motors
|
| (...) What I'd like to see would be a Lego computer that was as flexible, expandable and reconfigurable as the mechanical parts of the Lego system. I'd like to think in terms of using something like an I2C bus between 'modules' - where a module (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
