Subject:
|
Re: RCX+PC=Rubik's Cube Solver
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:57:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
852 times
|
| |
|
|
Brian --
> Regarding precision of movement, why not keep your rotation sensors, but add a • touch sensor to each
> arm for calibration only?
Thanks for the suggestion. This also would make the initial setup much less
clunky (at the moment you have to manually set the LEFT and RIGHT grabbers to
horizontal). The main problems are the location of the 16t that takes power
from the chain drive and the position of the rotation sensor. Both these
elements stick up and catch (almost) anything sticking out from the open ends
of the Large Technic Turntable. Maybe there's a way to put a knob on the end
of an axle sticking out of the middle hole of the walled side of the LTT. I'll
give it a try over the weekend.
Cheers
JP
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RCX+PC=Rubik's Cube Solver
|
| J P Brown wrote: Ditto the other comments, plus very elegantly constructed. Excellent commentary as well. Regarding precision of movement, why not keep your rotation sensors, but add a touch sensor to each arm for calibration only? (...) -- (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
