Message has 9 Replies:
 | | RE: RCX+PC=Rubik's Cube Solver
|
| (...) DUDE! These are unbelievable......I would never even consider doing something like this due to other time constraints like partners and kids. These are amazing - a must see and candidate for Site of the Week, no? Cheers, Ralph Hempel (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| | | Re: RCX+PC=Rubik's Cube Solver
|
| (...) [...] Whoa. I'm a Cube nut, but it never occurred to me to even try such a thing. Count me among the *extremely* impressed. And yes, please post the code when it's ready. I'm curious to know what cube-solving algorithm you use. BTW - how long (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: RCX+PC=Rubik's Cube Solver
|
| J P Brown wrote: Ditto the other comments, plus very elegantly constructed. Excellent commentary as well. Regarding precision of movement, why not keep your rotation sensors, but add a touch sensor to each arm for calibration only? (...) -- (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: RCX+PC=Rubik's Cube Solver
|
| As an old Rubik's and (relatively) new Mindstorms fan, I'm completely voiceless in front of this incredible device... Is there any hope to see a DAT file of this wonder ? Cheers, Philo (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: RCX+PC=Rubik's Cube Solver
|
| Ok, I'm a bit late, and every compliment has been made, but this is FANTASTIC, a unique combination of different technologies, you must have a lot of patient and perseverance ! (...) -- met vriendelijke groet, Stef Mientki email: (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
