Subject:
|
Re: CM-RCX comm
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:51:47 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Marco C. <MARCO@spamcakeSOPORCEL.PT>
|
Viewed:
|
735 times
|
| |
|
|
At 10:15 31-01-2001 +0000, Marco C. wrote:
> At 22:30 30-01-2001 -0600, Steve Baker wrote:
> I'm now trying to speed up as much as possible the SlowVLL protocol, using
> Wait(10)/Wait(20) combinations for ZERO and the opposite,
> Wait(20)/Wait(10), for ONE.
oops, it's the other way around:
Wait(20)/Wait(10) combinations for ZERO and Wait(10)/Wait(20) for ONE.
mc.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: CM-RCX comm
|
| Status Report: 1) Ok, just got my RIS 1.0 set (AT LAST! ;) 2) My first tests with the two pBricks (CyberMaster and RCX) prove that it's possible to communicate using a (ten times) slower version of VLL protocol (I call it SlowVLL for short). *It (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
