Subject:
|
Re: CM-RCX comm
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:10:06 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Marco C. <marco@soporcel.ptNOSPAM>
|
Viewed:
|
857 times
|
| |
|
|
At 08:47 25-01-2001 +0100, karl-johan krantz wrote:
> At 11:17 23-01-2001 +0000, Marco C. wrote:
> > 2) I ordered also a Dark Side MicroScout, for VLL output tests and proper
> > calibration, so I have a "standard" VLL input device to compare things. I'd
> > like to have a CodePilot, but can't find one "cheap" :(
> I read your post in Lugnet and just wonder what you'r planing to use the
> CodePilot for ?
> I gott one RCX one CyberMaster and one CodePilot and im intrested in other
> peoples ideas !
Ok, one of many possible examples (we're talking about Lego, where your
imagination is your limit... err... well, almost ;)
I could use an input port of a RCX as a 4th motor controller, using VLL
through the LED of a LightSensor connected to the barcode reader of the
CodePilot.
I could use the CodePilot's sensor to close a claw (on contact with the
object I want to grab) controlled by the CodePilot's motor, and to open the
claw, just send a VLL command to it.
etc, etc, etc... :)
mc.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: CM-RCX comm
|
| (...) Yes, the Off() does a shortcircuit simulating a ON state from a TouchSensor point of view. The Float() does the oposite, getting a OFF state this way. (...) I'm using NQC, because all this has to run on a CyberMaster, with it's fixed standard (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
