To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 957
956  |  958
Subject: 
Re: Lego at Gerf.Org
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.publish
Date: 
Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:42:24 GMT
Reply-To: 
MATTDM@MATTDM.stopspammersORG
Viewed: 
778 times
  
James Brown <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote:
Yes, but people aren't reasonable. :)  And I suspect that if you went out and
asked 10 random people what company owned "lego.gerf.org", most of them would
tell you "Lego".

Really? That's pretty sad.


And I don't know about the rest of you, but if I saw lego.castles.org, or
lego.blacktron.org, I would sure as heck think it was an official site.


I assume that Blacktron is a trademark of TLG. (It's definitely "their"
word, in any case.) So yeah, assuming that lego.blacktron.org belongs to TLG
makes sense. But (and I mean this in all the best way) if you associate
anything at castles.org with TLG, you're being silly.



My point is that merely the fact that this conversation is happening means
that there may be some confusion.

I don't think so. I think it illustrates that there is very little
confusion: not a single person thought "Oh wait, maybe this guy actually has
checked with TLG and gotten sponsorship of his site. It's possible that he's
got some sort of authorized specialness."



--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                       --->             http://quotes-r-us.org/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Lego at Gerf.Org
 
(...) That possibility, or that I >think< that? ;-) (...) When I read a URL that conists primarily of words, I instinctively try to read it as a sentence instead of as placeholders for a string of numbers. <shrug> That's the language I grew up with. (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lego at Gerf.Org
 
(...) Techinically. But I think it's safe to say that TLG was not aiming their fair play document at internet design experts. They were aiming it at laymen. I suspect (but can't prove) that if you ask the average joe in the street what at internet (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)

37 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR