Subject:
|
Re: web page in frames
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sun, 12 Sep 1999 09:06:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1181 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew Miller:
> Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@cats.nbi.dk> wrote:
> > Sounds a lot like on option in the configuration of Opera.
>
> Is this an option just to make frames not work, or does it actually ask the
> server for a non-frames version?
It simply shows the NOFRAMES element in stead of the FRAMES
element. That is how frames/no-frames negotiation was
defined by Netscape.
It is sad that we are stuck with this horrible solution just
because the programmers at Netscrape couldn't figure out how
to implement the BANNER element/link.
Jacob (the angry young man)
------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://www.ldraw.org/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: web page in frames
|
| (...) The main problem with this is the way Lynx deals with frames -- it shows you the "NOFRAMES" part, AND gives you links to the frames. So you end up with a (slightly kludgy) way to use the frames, right next to a message from the website telling (...) (25 years ago, 12-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: web page in frames
|
| (...) Is this an option just to make frames not work, or does it actually ask the server for a non-frames version? (I know that the way frames work allows the index page to have a <NOFRAMES> section. But that's pretty inelegant.) (25 years ago, 11-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
