Subject:
|
Re: web page in frames
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 21:46:47 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@io.!stopspammers!com
|
Viewed:
|
1238 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> > (Because people hate frames)
> I'm serious, actually. It's a prejudice spawned by a lot of sites with
> terrible use of frames. Sure, they're easy to misuse, but that doesn't make
> all uses bad.
No, what makes frames bad is that the browsers don't give any easy way to
discover the URL for any but the top frame. This opens the door real wide
for banner abuse, and there's nothing you can do on the server end to
indicate beneficial frame, except to never use them.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: web page in frames
|
| (...) I'm not convinced by that. You could say exactly the same thing for images, and it's been a few years since I heard anyone calling for the abolishment of graphics on the web. (25 years ago, 11-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: web page in frames
|
| (...) Those people are silly. :) I'm serious, actually. It's a prejudice spawned by a lot of sites with terrible use of frames. Sure, they're easy to misuse, but that doesn't make all uses bad. (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
