Subject:
|
Re: web page in frames
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Sep 1999 04:27:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1176 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Matthew Miller writes:
> Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> wrote:
> > Frames are bad, because they destroy the addressing scheme
> > of the Web.
>
> I can see this argument more than the others. It would have been nice for
> there to be a way to give a URL which specifies a frameset with given
> contents. Hmm. Maybe I'll implement that for my pages which use frames.
>
> --
> Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
> Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
okay everyone, i've taken my page out of frames,
sorry to bring it up.
still though what do u think of my page?
Alex "I HATE FRAMES! DIE FRAMES, DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" Roode
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: web page in frames
|
| Alex: (...) There is still something fishy if you enter the site through the "official" URL[1], where you have a single frame frameset, which does exactly what you don't want - destroys the addressing scheme. Why not keep the entry page[2] at that (...) (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: web page in frames
|
| (...) I can see this argument more than the others. It would have been nice for there to be a way to give a URL which specifies a frameset with given contents. Hmm. Maybe I'll implement that for my pages which use frames. (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
