Subject:
|
Re: web page in frames
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sun, 12 Sep 1999 18:15:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1074 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew Miller:
> Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> wrote:
> > It simply shows the NOFRAMES element in stead of the FRAMES
> > element. That is how frames/no-frames negotiation was
> > defined by Netscape.
>
> The main problem with this is the way Lynx deals with frames -- it shows you
> the "NOFRAMES" part, AND gives you links to the frames. So you end up with a
> (slightly kludgy) way to use the frames, right next to a message from the
> website telling you that you can't use them.
I have never found this a problem for anybody but the
apparently uneducated author of thoose pages.
> Plus (and I know this matters less in these days of high bandwidth), it just
> seems inefficient to send both options no matter what.
I find this a larger problem (but it is mostly "solved" by
keeping the NOFRAMES content to short insults ;-).
> So it'd be cool if this could be negotiated with the server.
Then it wouldn't be "FRAMES" anymore. The real problem is
that Netscrape insisted on a bad solution - even when there
was a (fully backwards compatible) better one.
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://www.ldraw.org/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: web page in frames
|
| (...) The main problem with this is the way Lynx deals with frames -- it shows you the "NOFRAMES" part, AND gives you links to the frames. So you end up with a (slightly kludgy) way to use the frames, right next to a message from the website telling (...) (25 years ago, 12-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
