Subject:
|
Re: web page in frames
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sun, 12 Sep 1999 23:50:55 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.^NoSpam^org
|
Viewed:
|
1090 times
|
| |
|
|
Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> wrote:
> Then it wouldn't be "FRAMES" anymore. The real problem is
Why not? It could be done the same way http allows for autonegotiation of
languages, image types, etc.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: web page in frames
|
| Matthew Miller: (...) Because we would need a whole different specification and implementation. Frames are bad, because they destroy the addressing scheme of the Web. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: web page in frames
|
| Matthew Miller: (...) I have never found this a problem for anybody but the apparently uneducated author of thoose pages. (...) I find this a larger problem (but it is mostly "solved" by keeping the NOFRAMES content to short insults ;-). (...) Then (...) (25 years ago, 12-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
