Subject:
|
Re: web page in frames
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:50:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.{Spamcake}org
|
Viewed:
|
861 times
|
| |
|
|
Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> wrote:
> It simply shows the NOFRAMES element in stead of the FRAMES
> element. That is how frames/no-frames negotiation was
> defined by Netscape.
The main problem with this is the way Lynx deals with frames -- it shows you
the "NOFRAMES" part, AND gives you links to the frames. So you end up with a
(slightly kludgy) way to use the frames, right next to a message from the
website telling you that you can't use them.
Plus (and I know this matters less in these days of high bandwidth), it just
seems inefficient to send both options no matter what.
So it'd be cool if this could be negotiated with the server.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: web page in frames
|
| Matthew Miller: (...) I have never found this a problem for anybody but the apparently uneducated author of thoose pages. (...) I find this a larger problem (but it is mostly "solved" by keeping the NOFRAMES content to short insults ;-). (...) Then (...) (25 years ago, 12-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: web page in frames
|
| Matthew Miller: (...) It simply shows the NOFRAMES element in stead of the FRAMES element. That is how frames/no-frames negotiation was defined by Netscape. It is sad that we are stuck with this horrible solution just because the programmers at (...) (25 years ago, 12-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
