Subject:
|
Re: web page in frames
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 21:43:42 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.orgANTISPAM
|
Viewed:
|
886 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> (Because people hate frames)
Those people are silly.
:)
I'm serious, actually. It's a prejudice spawned by a lot of sites with
terrible use of frames. Sure, they're easy to misuse, but that doesn't make
all uses bad.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: web page in frames
|
| (...) No, what makes frames bad is that the browsers don't give any easy way to discover the URL for any but the top frame. This opens the door real wide for banner abuse, and there's nothing you can do on the server end to indicate beneficial (...) (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
| | | Re: web page in frames
|
| (...) Didn't we have this debate already? I'm on the other side of the fence from you on this. Nothing has changed since the last time I listed my reasons. (25 years ago, 11-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: web page in frames
|
| (...) (Because people hate frames) (...) Ooo, I hadn't thought of that. I'll have to ponder that idea some more. Steve (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
