Subject:
|
Re: web page in frames
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Sep 1999 03:11:24 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
{mattdm@}stopspammers{mattdm.org}
|
Viewed:
|
1401 times
|
| |
|
|
Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> wrote:
> Frames are bad, because they destroy the addressing scheme
> of the Web.
I can see this argument more than the others. It would have been nice for
there to be a way to give a URL which specifies a frameset with given
contents. Hmm. Maybe I'll implement that for my pages which use frames.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: web page in frames
|
| (...) okay everyone, i've taken my page out of frames, sorry to bring it up. still though what do u think of my page? Alex "I HATE FRAMES! DIE FRAMES, DIE!!!...!!!" Roode (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: web page in frames
|
| Matthew Miller: (...) Because we would need a whole different specification and implementation. Frames are bad, because they destroy the addressing scheme of the Web. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
