 | | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) That there are two methods on which we could base LENNI, and it's fairly apparent to me that one needs to be chosen over the other. Dual development is a hindrance in the long run. (...) Not this minute, but definitely soon. I think the next (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Dan Boger wrote: (a lot of very informative stuff that made my head spin a bit, although I now think I know which Dan favors which does carry some weight with me, Dan's often right, technically... ) So what's the net here? Does (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
|
(...) Adding tags to the spec isn't "expensive" - and since clients won't be required to implement support for new tags, unless they want to, I say, let's think of anything we can want, and then decide if it's worth adding to the spec or not. :) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) Heh, the biggest political fight of recent techies. Used to be XML, but that has settled down considerably. I used to follow the fight, but got really tired of it... I did come the conclusion that Mark Pilgrim (of the Atom side) knows what (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
|
(...) Sorry about that, got distracted! Mostly BrickFest, some other things. Back on it again, and your email from 1 August was very helpful in setting the direction for LENNI. (...) I think both Atom and RSS as a base would allow us to do this. (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
|
Hi Kelly, (...) As said earlier by mail, I think that this is the most important thing to have implemented in a "LEGO community related" newssystem. Since I got no replies after I mentioned it in the globalAFOL group, I thought the participated (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
|
Time to break this into a subthread, I think... RSS v. Atom - Pro and Con Time So now that I've spent the last few hours reading the (URL) history>[1] of RSS v2.0 and what's become Atom (although the Homer Simpson in me liked its previous name, (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) Well, as long as the content you're feeding it is pure ascii. For instance, getting LUGNET posts to be valid RSS was not as easy as I thought it would be. Making one for 1000stein would be even harder. Dealing with charsets, embedded images (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) Same here. Good point about spec changes, Jake. I'd love to do a pro/con list of RSS/Atom, but I don't know enough yet, so I guess I'll have to research that some more. My main concern is using something that can be used by the maximum number (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) I think you're right, at least in theory, that Atom is the better standard, simply because it's being designed from day one to be what it is meant to be. (Whereas the RSS format has sorta bounced around from concept to concept, then was (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) AFAIK, yes - most CMSs, and almost all aggregators do support atom. (...) I don't think there's much of a difference between emitting Atom or RSS/LENNI, but I don't have that strong a preference. If everyone else is dead against Atom, I'll go (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) Exxxxxccccccelent (in best Monty Burns voice) (...) That's exactly right - leverage the tools out there, build on them, but don't require them. If, say, there are 100 LEGO-related RSS feeds available, and 25 of them are LENNI-enhanced, (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) I've just looked over some of the Atom docs, but it seems very similar to RSS to me, only much newer. Is Atom supported by many current blog or web publishing software? My thoughts were that straight RSS feeds would work within the LENNI (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) I've become convinced that Atom might be a better solution. If only because it has better mechanisms to ensure that entries are identified uniquely, and support for meta information about authors, etc. (...) If we're using RSS, using a custom (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) Sounds like a great project Kelly! I'm on board to help out! Bill, I think that the idea is that the base of this extended RSS format would be RSS "standard friendly", and that the extensions would simply be ignored by RSS readers/aggregators. (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) Sounds like a great initiative. Thanks! My site has, coincidentally, been recently converted to use blog software (blosxom) to deliver content. That means there is automatic RSS support. My RSS feed for Lego postings is at (URL) would say that (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) Way to go, Kelly! Once again, you rock :-) -Tim (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
Call for technical participation in a proposal for LEGO enthusiast content sharing. BACKGROUND: I've been working on a project for a couple of months that extends the RSS spec to encompass envisioned needs of specific communities, specifically (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.org, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Keynote presentation
|
|
(...) Larry, based on the setback this community already encountered with a magazine, how far away do you think such a thing is, realistically? How much time will it take to rebuild some of the trust that was lost? And who will it take to lead such (...) (20 years ago, 18-Aug-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Biomechanical Bricks Web Site *UPDATED*
|
|
Biomechanicalbricks.com has been updated. Aside from some minor issues, it is ready for viewing. (URL) Feel free to report any issues you may find. Thank you! Minor Issues: Need more flashy image for main index page. Reduce thumb sizes on Mr. (...) (20 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
