| |
Ok it seems a few people are in a tizzy, so I am hoping to defuse it a little.
But as Larry said we should let it go. (I know, if we should just let it go,
then why am I replying at all? Because I don't think it will just go away.) No
harm was intended on either side. I will try to reply to specific comments. (I
will be assuming things based on words written by others, if you feel I am
wrong, or putting words in your mouth please correct me, I am only trying to
help everyone feel hunky-dorry again, not stir up more angst.)
Ben wrote this:
> > I hope I didn't upset you at the start...but while I can understand your
> > confusion... it somewhat upset me that you thought that Michlug was the
> > group capable of putting out a decent lego show / event. -Benjamin Medinets • In reply, Scott wrote this:
> Where in the world did this comment come from? Who *EVER* said that MichLUG is
> the only group capable of putting out a decent LEGO show or event? That is
> uncalled for. We all know that many groups around the world put out great
> displays, and more power to them. To even imply that MichLUG thinks otherwise
> is totally uncalled for. Please stop saying things you don't know anything
> about. Tony and I were just wondering what that reference was to, since
> usually Chris tells us if hegoes tot hat kind of thing.
> Scott S.
I think Ben was reply in reference to Tony's post:
http://news.lugnet.com/org/us/michlug/?n=1729
paraphrased here:
> What is the rtlToronto/Train2? Is that another show Michlug is going to
> attend? What be da deal?
My impression of Tony's comment is that he hadn't heard of rtlToronto or
rtlToronto/Train2, so he was afraid it was something we were going to do, and
he needed to get prepared for it. But I think Ben maybe have thought his
comment was in jest, saying that if it wasn't a MichLUG event it couldn't be
important. This prespective could be further justified because everybody and
there brother took pictures at GRGATS and we all posted them.(This is not a bad
thing, it's great. But others may/maynot be sick of seeing yet more pictures
of that MichLUG event.)
Ben writes:
http://news.lugnet.com/org/us/michlug/?n=1774
> I wasn't trying to pick a fight....though. As for the "extra" comments,
> about the filming techniques...and such, it was a little about what happened
> at the last show / event. I was hoping those comments would contribute to a
> curiousity to come out to Train2, and not the other comments. I've seen some
> of the pictures from your events....yes you don't need to brag because the
> work stands for itself(Lar's comment), but on the same token, the stuff we put
> out at the last show should stand on its own merit.... and this next
> event.....all I can say is come out and see for yourself. I hope my comments
> are just that....my comments, and I hope they (the comments) don't hinder you
> from coming out.
My commenting on this doesn't really pertain to the arguement, but I do want to
say that I am now indeed interesting in attending, and will have to see how it
pans out, with money, time spent with the fiancee, etc.
-Jason
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: What 50 bags of white tiles can do( was Re: More pics
|
| Ben & All, (...) Well, Ben, it was harsh, and uncalled for. I read the post, and still find it rather bad. Your explanation, IMHO, does not seem to warrant it. (...) Hmm... it seems like it to me, this post does nothing to convince me of that. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
