Subject:
|
RE: block scoreing....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:03:01 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
<{rhempel@bmts.}spamless{com}>
|
Viewed:
|
488 times
|
| |
|
|
> > Okay, well, then you can tell the difference between ambient and black,
> > right? So, set your sorter to always accept, and then if it sees black,
> > reject.
>
> no.
>
> Black is the good brick, and BLACK is the same colour I can not see.
Ok, Chris. I'll type this slow becasue I know you can't read very
fast...
Can you tell me what would happen if you rejected the blocks
you CAN see, that you don't want?
And then can you tell me what happens if you accept nothing, and the
black bricks you DO want?
I'll wait a minute......
Yes! You would have only the black bricks (that you do want) and some
nothing shaped and coloured bricks that you don't want. Of course, you
can't see those nothing bricks, and Calum cannot see them, and Steve
cannot see them. So they do not go against your score.
Ralph
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: block scoreing....
|
| (...) Ralph, I know where you live now....... (...) OK. people, I want to thank you for your help (cough cough) but the problem has been solved. the reason many of you seem confused is because you don't understand how my EOAT is set up. its not (...) (21 years ago, 9-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: block scoreing....
|
| (...) no. Black is the good brick, and BLACK is the same colour I can not see. (...) because it was bruce's fault. he made me re-read the rules page and that's when I noticed I had been sorting the wrong brick all this time. -- Chris (21 years ago, 8-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
