Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto15 January issues
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:35:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
429 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 05:16:47PM +0000, Jeff Van Winden wrote:
> > So Calum you are suggesting that the shortest path would be the marked
> > path, but if a robot goofs up, and turns the wrong way, it can
> > continue, and take a longer, route that will still lead it to the
> > critical path.
>
> Wouldn't it be useful, since you could avoid the other robot, and not
> have to bash your way through it?
That's the other benefit of having secondary paths-not reducing the game to
sumo. A single decision up front to go onto an alternate path allows a
competitor to avoid a sumo like game.
Calum
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
30 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
