Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto15 January issues
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:05:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
402 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Would this mean then that robots would need to be able to lift guidewheels to
> clear branching points? That's how I read what you say about "grid", that there
> are tee/Y/cross pipe parts and not just bends.
Yup. That's always been the deal with rtl15, to be able to traverse T or Y
shapes. But previously, the rtl15 competition was to be one true path and the
other path would always terminate. I'm suggesting we don't terminate, but
instead offer alternate good paths.
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: rtlToronto15 January issues
|
| (...) So Calum you are suggesting that the shortest path would be the marked path, but if a robot goofs up, and turns the wrong way, it can continue, and take a longer, route that will still lead it to the critical path. Calum, are you being (...) (21 years ago, 25-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: rtlToronto15 January issues
|
| (...) Would this mean then that robots would need to be able to lift guidewheels to clear branching points? That's how I read what you say about "grid", that there are tee/Y/cross pipe parts and not just bends. (21 years ago, 25-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
