To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 8774
8773  |  8775
Subject: 
Re: rtlToronto15 January issues
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:31:13 GMT
Viewed: 
477 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Jeff Van Winden wrote:
So Calum you are suggesting that the shortest path would be the marked path, but
if a robot goofs up, and turns the wrong way, it can continue, and take a
longer, route that will still lead it to the critical path.

Calum, are you being influanced by your Project Managment experience... Do we
have an estimated time for completion baised on the critical path?

Sad thing is I learned CPM techniques in first year, but the best implementation
I've ever seen is in our GPS lab, where they put on the whiteboard whoever's
behind the 8 ball.  It gets people working FAST, and no need for CPM charting
either.

Back on topic,  The major problem I see with rtl15 is maze strength.  If we have
terminated bad branches, I'm not sure the thing will stay together.  Hence, I
wanted to build it stronger, using the bad branches as part of the structure.

We can still do bad branches as terminations, but use them as part of the
structure, just mark off the bad paths.

Or we can be nice and offer secondary paths on the bad branches.

I'm reminded by a game called "Sam and Max Hit the Road" where you could never
actually get a Game Over-the game was always winnable whatever the path of
choices you took.

I'd like to think rtl15 could be like that...except the best robots wouldn't
ever need the secondary path.

Calum



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: rtlToronto15 January issues
 
(...) I think you've got a good idea here. If we build it right, we wouldn't have to rebuild it to have a different maze for subsequent rounds, we could just mark different paths through the maze. I don't like the idea of having more then one (...) (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: rtlToronto15 January issues
 
(...) So Calum you are suggesting that the shortest path would be the marked path, but if a robot goofs up, and turns the wrong way, it can continue, and take a longer, route that will still lead it to the critical path. Calum, are you being (...) (21 years ago, 25-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

30 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR