 | | Re: The Train Show (since we were, indeed, talking about it...)
|
|
(...) 19 high it is, I will get that done ASAP. Thanks Dave. That should be a much more realistic height for me to pull off working cable cars, but only time will tell since I'm short on technic links. Just to make sure I'm on track, so to speak, (...) (19 years ago, 28-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: The Train Show (since we were, indeed, talking about it...)
|
|
(...) layout? Remember the rest of us are about 2 inchs shorter then we used to be. I can get you more exact height. What are the times for the show? When can we get in for setup? Derek (19 years ago, 28-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | The Train Show (since we were, indeed, talking about it...)
|
|
So I redesigned the other side of the layout 'cause there was way too much real-estate for me to fill... (URL) a few things--Janey, sorry it took so long, but if you can peg your 'Frisco house row to be somewhere around 19 bricks when it reached my (...) (19 years ago, 28-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I think we shoudl try this sometime...
|
|
(...) ummmm Brian, thats not the correct use of the term... "to pull a hassenplug" nice try. i dont think it will win any contests though.(tm) :) Chris (19 years ago, 28-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) Either way, with HITWs or with open topped hoppers, I'm all for this game, and think it'll be a good challenge. I think part of the challenge will be to make a good EOAT to deposit DNA, while at the same time building/programming the 'bot to (...) (19 years ago, 28-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I think we shoudl try this sometime...
|
|
(...) Well, there's a couple of ways you could do it. You could say that no single attempt can take longer than n+10 seconds (or something), where n is the number of seconds the robot could make the run in by the shortest path. That way, it will (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) And this system has worked amazingly well for 19 competitions. But it's for this reason you probably won't see me around on Feb. 11th. And as I've felt for quite a while, our oppinion, in the end, doesn't count. They "TRY" (in captial letters) (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I think we shoudl try this sometime...
|
|
(...) I couldn't find a line maze at the link you gave...did you mean this (URL) ? -Rob A> (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Queens University (Kingston) to try breaking bridge record
|
|
I found this (FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2005) and haven't seen it posted. (URL) "The team is working to accumulate enough Lego blocks to build a bridge spanning up to six metres—surpassing efforts of a previous team who built a three-metre bridge." (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think we shoudl try this sometime...
|
|
(...) I don't get why you wouldn't know it perfectly the second time through? Derek (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: to recap-- was Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) I don't really like this. I think the opening should be much more constrained, like Chris was talking about. X blocks high Y studs wide. No variation allowed. It's going to be hard to tell if you found a hole, or are stuck between two other (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I think we shoudl try this sometime...
|
|
(...) I have that maze that I made for BF a couple of years ago. It has adjustable walls. This allows for a practice period followed by a change in maze geometry for the actual competition. Thus people cannot "preprogram" the winning route. I am not (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
Rob Antonishen wrote: > On 9/27/05, Chris Magno wrote: > snipping rob being patronizing. Maybe adding a standing rule that all entries > have to run once on their own in a "qualifying" round to compete. > now this idea has some merit !!!! THIS rule (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | I think we shoudl try this sometime...
|
|
Along with great suggestions from Greg... I have one, taken from this post-- (URL) its a Hassenplug plug ;) ) find the video on this page-- (URL) check out that maze thing--it's line following but your 'bot has to learn each time it goes thru the (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: to recap-- was Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote: <snip> (...) I think the main goal is to make the competition challenging enough. I missed out on rice grabbers, but that was pretty challenging. I think if we leave it with moving 'dump trucks' a (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: to recap-- was Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) full of open top autonomous stationarty BOX's!!!! (...) around the entire perimeter, and just have technic beams every 5 inches around the perimeter. That follows the rules, but is more like the 'open top' concept, except now I have 'open (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) Then, grasshopper - if you learned nothing I am saddened, Is a competitive contest there are two ways to "win": 1) to succeed by completing the objective. 2) to cause the opponent to fail, thus win by default. This is why the "trivial case" (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) Greg - I agree completely! My point was not that we should endorse loophole entries or trivial entries, but encourage contests that lend them to an RCX solution. I also liked Dave's bot the best. It was well designed and exceptionally cool to (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) Expet if we add my idea that you DON'T want any block in your box. Sitting still would be BAD. Run away! Then Derek's "blast a lot of bricks into the air" idea could work... leading to LUCK winning or losing the game (however I like that idea, (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) thank you greg. well said. and a very good point. sadly, we will forever have to struggle with where a line is between allowing non rcx bots and rcx based bots. why was robs monkey bot OK? why was my beam robot ok? why was a ring robot not? (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
