| |
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Tim Strutt writes:
> Wow, leave the newsgroups for one night and I miss a whole thread.
> This is too funny. I'm sorry to see that people's feathers got ruffled,
> but I can't help laughing.
> And all because of a "p.s." to Chris at the end of my post. Wow.
Kinda what i was thinking.All this from a P.S.:-)
> Everybody get back to building trains and layouts, and let's not forget
> that LEGO is a non-aggressive sport. <grin>
> Play well.
>
> Tim Strutt 8^)
> ParLUGment #2
>
> p.s. Sorry to hear you won't make it Chris. I was really looking
> forward to seeing that airport in person. Maybe next time?
Don't count me out for sure just yet.I want to go real bad:-)I need to have
a little chat with Ben M. anyways....I'll bring a couple of my work tools
nothing special just my everyday tools a couple of 24 inch pipe wrenches and
we can have a little chat...(it's not a real smart to miff a construction
worker off :-) )
>
> Jason Spears wrote:
>
> > Ok it seems a few people are in a tizzy, so I am hoping to defuse it a little.
> > But as Larry said we should let it go. (I know, if we should just let it go,
> > then why am I replying at all? Because I don't think it will just go away.) No
> > harm was intended on either side. I will try to reply to specific comments. (I
> > will be assuming things based on words written by others, if you feel I am
> > wrong, or putting words in your mouth please correct me, I am only trying to
> > help everyone feel hunky-dorry again, not stir up more angst.)
> >
> > Ben wrote this:
> > > > I hope I didn't upset you at the start...but while I can understand your
> > > > confusion... it somewhat upset me that you thought that Michlug was the
> > > > group capable of putting out a decent lego show / event. -Benjamin Medinets • In reply, Scott wrote this:
> > > Where in the world did this comment come from? Who *EVER* said that MichLUG is
> > > the only group capable of putting out a decent LEGO show or event? That is
> > > uncalled for. We all know that many groups around the world put out great
> > > displays, and more power to them. To even imply that MichLUG thinks otherwise
> > > is totally uncalled for. Please stop saying things you don't know anything
> > > about. Tony and I were just wondering what that reference was to, since
> > > usually Chris tells us if hegoes tot hat kind of thing.
> > > Scott S.
> >
> > I think Ben was reply in reference to Tony's post:
> > http://news.lugnet.com/org/us/michlug/?n=1729
> > paraphrased here:
> > > What is the rtlToronto/Train2? Is that another show Michlug is going to
> > > attend? What be da deal?
> >
> > My impression of Tony's comment is that he hadn't heard of rtlToronto or
> > rtlToronto/Train2, so he was afraid it was something we were going to do, and
> > he needed to get prepared for it. But I think Ben maybe have thought his
> > comment was in jest, saying that if it wasn't a MichLUG event it couldn't be
> > important. This prespective could be further justified because everybody and
> > there brother took pictures at GRGATS and we all posted them.(This is not a bad
> > thing, it's great. But others may/maynot be sick of seeing yet more pictures
> > of that MichLUG event.)
> >
> > Ben writes:
> > http://news.lugnet.com/org/us/michlug/?n=1774
> > > I wasn't trying to pick a fight....though. As for the "extra" comments,
> > > about the filming techniques...and such, it was a little about what happened
> > > at the last show / event. I was hoping those comments would contribute to a
> > > curiousity to come out to Train2, and not the other comments. I've seen some
> > > of the pictures from your events....yes you don't need to brag because the
> > > work stands for itself(Lar's comment), but on the same token, the stuff we put
> > > out at the last show should stand on its own merit.... and this next
> > > event.....all I can say is come out and see for yourself. I hope my comments
> > > are just that....my comments, and I hope they (the comments) don't hinder you
> > > from coming out.
> >
> > My commenting on this doesn't really pertain to the arguement, but I do want to
> > say that I am now indeed interesting in attending, and will have to see how it
> > pans out, with money, time spent with the fiancee, etc.
> >
> > -Jason
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
32 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
