Subject:
|
Re: UML +/-
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 04:09:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
324 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> <snip>
>
> Rereading that it sounds like I don't like/approve of UML. That would be
> incorrect. That it has been adopted as a standard instead of several rival
> notations and methodologies is a *huge( win for the industry. And I think
> it's tremendously useful in the proper context. It *is* learnable and people
> that use it a lot do not trip over the notations the way I do.
>
> I just don't use it all that much myself since I don't necessarily spend a
> lot of time in the design space...
Understandable. Actually, I *didn't* get the impression that you didn't like
UML; I just got the impression that its uses weren't fully, well, useful to you.
<shameless plug>
My dad's methodology, while not directly opposing UML, challanges some of
the concepts that UML is built on (the Object Oriented approach). His
Object-Process Methodology (OPM) treats processes independently from
objects, and as equal entities. Instead of the 9 UML models, there is *just
one* - which manages to portray everything the 9 UML models do. The model is
then presented in both graphics and a collection of natural-language
sentences, with equivalent semantics. The two representations complement e/o
and appeal to both sides of the brain, both visually and lingually.
His book is going to be coming out in print sometime this next academic year
(2001-2002).
</shameless plug>
I get no percentage of his profits, just to be clear on that. ;-)
-Shiri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: UML +/-
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> Rereading that it sounds like I don't like/approve of UML. That would be incorrect. That it has been adopted as a standard instead of several rival notations and methodologies is a *huge( win (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
