Subject:
|
Re: UML +/-
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:21:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
389 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Larry Pieniazek writes:
<snip>
Rereading that it sounds like I don't like/approve of UML. That would be
incorrect. That it has been adopted as a standard instead of several rival
notations and methodologies is a *huge( win for the industry. And I think
it's tremendously useful in the proper context. It *is* learnable and people
that use it a lot do not trip over the notations the way I do.
I just don't use it all that much myself since I don't necessarily spend a
lot of time in the design space...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: UML +/-
|
| (...) Understandable. Actually, I *didn't* get the impression that you didn't like UML; I just got the impression that its uses weren't fully, well, useful to you. <shameless plug> My dad's methodology, while not directly opposing UML, challanges (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | UML +/-
|
| (...) I work in the real world and I am usually at the leading edge where we are trying to get the basic concepts down. So UML is overly precise for what I typically need to convey. I am usually at the lines and boxes level and showing a mishmash of (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
