 | | Re: Need info on "#include" tag in HTML
|
|
keyed "altavista" into browser url window... keyed "what about the html tag include" into search window about a million matches... number two was (URL) time <30 seconds, I love altavista :?) bishop Franklin W. Cain wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The Pleiades
|
|
(...) Build your own, join the ATM community! My 8" mirror is coming along nicely... Jasper (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: MSIE5 security hole
|
|
(...) Sure glad I choose my family members better - and i certainly choose which of them I hand my email address to. If they're clued enough that I want to talk to them, they can damn well go to Dejanews^H^H^H^H. About the browser thingies: (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Need info on "#include" tag in HTML
|
|
Help! I need info on the "#include" tag (supposedly used to incorporate a separately stored "fragment" of common or repeated HTML code into multiple files). What I (vaguely) remember is: <!-- #include "my_fragment.h" --> Thanks in advance. Franklin (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
Well, I'm working on a little project for a local ISP and I need a good, professional-looking autorun menu-type thing. I'm no coder, so I can't just whip up my own (actually, I did whip up my own with the help of a friend on Friday in VB, but it's (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | bad microsoft, bad.
|
|
yay! (25 years ago, 6-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: web design (was Re: Scout secrets revealed)
|
|
(...) Good point. It all depends on how often the nav bar stuff is going to be used. I can imagine some sites/types of content where you're going to want to always have the navigation stuff handy. For others, it's in the way most of the time. One (...) (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: web design (was Re: Scout secrets revealed)
|
|
(...) up (...) Yes, but that's the difference between doing it with frames and doing it without. Put the navigation stuff in a frame across the top of the browser, and suddenly, when you scroll down the page you're reading, the navigation frame (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | web design (was Re: Scout secrets revealed)
|
|
(...) Not true, Eric. It's too bad so few web designers get confused by this. The navigation stuff only takes up space if it is currently scrolled into view. Any long message on LUGNET serves as a good example. Visit: (URL) is a set inventory). See (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Ed Boxer Goes to Enfiled - reformatted and updated
|
|
Steve: (...) There is nothing in the HTML specification that prevents this (AFAIR). It is just like the "BANNER" element - nobody cares to implement it. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Biting tin foil (Was: Lego VCR)
|
|
(...) I used to have perfect teeth up to one or two years ago, and I never had any problems with chewing tin foil (Hey, I chew a lot of things.. Urmm.. forget I said that.). Then I got two fillings, and when pretty much anything made of metal (be it (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Engine Speed Regulation
|
|
(...) (yes, they do regulate power, but I'm used to models not full size, where the water is of more concern usually than the power. Larry, take a look at (URL) some pics of my engines. For info, the Britannia (the green railway engine!) is very (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Engine Speed Regulation
|
|
Well, James corrected me and he's right(1). The Throttle is a restrictor (if you look up throttle, one meaning is to cut off airflow) in the steamline. Restricting the flow reduces the pressure in the steam chest. However most valve gear (cf. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Engine Speed Regulation
|
|
Thanks for the explanation! (Wow, so it is really possible to explain how the steam engine works without using a single picture!) (...) This looks like the PWM (pulse width modulation) method RCX uses to control its motor powers. Why the steam (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Ed Boxer Goes to Enfiled - reformatted and updated
|
|
(...) Or if there was a some sort of floating table concept, where mini-tables could be laid out, and the renderer/browser would arrange these atomic mini-tables simliar to the way images are handled. Steve (25 years ago, 1-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Engine Speed Regulation
|
|
An otto and a diesel are different things. An otto is not reversible without a lot of thought about how to get the spark timing right. (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Engine Speed Regulation
|
|
Great detailed explanations! If I simplify things, the throttle on a steam engine controls Torque. To set a certain speed with a certain load, a certain torque is needed. The speed regulator (governor) is a device that controls the applied torque so (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Engine Speed Regulation
|
|
(...) Sorry Larry, not true. The throttle controls the pressure in the steam chest (Ideally), which controls the speed. (in fact, it does regulate pressure, but also regulates volume) What you are suggesting is done on some engines (corliss mill (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Engine Speed Regulation
|
|
(...) Working from memory and I could be wrong. But I doubt it. Review. Reciprocating steam engines function by admitting pressurised steam into a chamber (the cylinder) where it expands, doing work against the walls. One of the walls (the piston (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: One of the Mindfest pics
|
|
(...) Yes, it does. Newer models have two, even. (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: One of the Mindfest pics
|
|
(...) Heh, I have a single 20mb CF card right now. I'd probably want a minimum of 2 of the 64mb cards to feel comfortable if I was bringing a Libretto along with me... (...) Yeah, the one I had in my office had either 1 or 2 PCMCIA slots in the unit (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | JPEG compression (was: Re: One of the Mindfest pics)
|
|
(...) Speaking of JPEG compression, here's a comparison of JPEG (lossy) vs. TIFF (non-lossy) for three images: (3 URLs) the last of the three pages contains several megabytes of inline images. --Todd (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: One of the Mindfest pics
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) I was a real strong believer in uncompressed (I'm allergic to jpeg compression). But I have to say, after playing a little with them (and the D700), I can tolerate the image quality they output at their (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Engine Speed Regulation
|
|
Here are some of the questions that have been nagging me since I was a kid. How does the press of the throttle affect the RPM and the torque of the engine? By looking at the R/C model engines, it seems to me that the throttle controls the amount of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: One of the Mindfest pics
|
|
(...) I don't think that they even _have_ an uncompressed mode. 1024x768x24bit = 2.3M. Too big for a floppy. The FD-based mavicas, from what I've heard, do reallly nasty jpeg compression in order to fit stuff in such a small space. Compact flash is (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: One of the Mindfest pics
|
|
(...) I actually read about this in a cheesy digital camera mag that I signed up for at Comdex a year or two ago. Lemme try Google... Turning up nothing. Hope this wasn't bogus in that mag... but I did find a post in rec.photo.digital that mentioned (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: One of the Mindfest pics
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) (I'll have to pop over to altavista...[1]) We have had excellent results with Sony Mavica FD-83's at school. They are floppy based, but can also take short mpeg movies with sound. Even people who have never (...) (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: One of the Mindfest pics
|
|
(...) Ooh, twoooo whole bedrooms. I can only dream.... :) (25 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: One of the Mindfest pics
|
|
(...) Ah, ok. Well, this is one reason why we're moving into a 3 bedroom apt from a 2 bedroom. (25 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: One of the Mindfest pics
|
|
(...) Part of the problem is again, the space thing. No room to store everything, and karen hates having the apartment cluttered with computer junk. (she likes having computers, but wants them to _work_....) (25 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: One of the Mindfest pics
|
|
(...) Ah, I see. Well, I gave MS my $40 for NT a long time ago (friend was an employee then) so I forget that most people don't have it laying around. (...) Those Libretto's are cool. I wish I could have taken the one from my old office to my new (...) (25 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: One of the Mindfest pics
|
|
(...) I'm dual-booting to Win95 (haven't gotten around to bothering with NT, and don't want to give MS any more of my money) to use Photoshop. The GIMP is decent, but it's not there yet in power, features, or ease of use. I hope it will be someday, (...) (25 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
(...) I saw some of those in the dollar store the other day. Unfortunately, they were from the time after Micheal Golden had left, but before Broderick had come on board. No wait, maybe it was after Broderick had left, too. Anyway, Karza was back, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
(...) Unless it's a hard drive, and then a Kilobyte is 10^3 (and for awhile was even actually measuring the "unformatted" capacity). (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
Great, now I´ll have to learn all of this ;-) I didn´t know there was such defined standards for mini, micro and nanofigs. But, well, times are changing.... But whats kibifig then? --Tobias <380a50fb.190663701@...et.com>... (...) size (...) 2^10 (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego.com - new look)
|
|
lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) writes: [big snip about LCD, GCF, GCD, LCM, etc...] You should teach fractions, Todd :) That's a much more in-depth explanation than my 5th grade math teacher ever gave (the one who kept asking me to tell her if she (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
(...) old (...) I suppose I should have had more soda before I wrote that. I got very little sleep last night. Megafig is what they have at Legoland and is also on Joe Davenport's web site. They actually have their own name (Legoland) but I have (...) (25 years ago, 17-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
(...) Yes, Micro- is 10^-6, but Mini- is not necessarily 10^-3. Mini- is any size less than 1. Milli- is 10^-3. (...) Macro is any size greater than 1 or greater than usual. It *can* be 10^3, but it isn't necessarily 10^3. Macroeconomics, for (...) (25 years ago, 17-Oct-99, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look)
|
|
(...) I forgot adult LEGO-ness! It's a wonderful opportunity to make a very confusing and misleading true statment! :) :) Male adult LEGO fans are quite uncommon. Hee hee! It's true!! :) --Todd (25 years ago, 17-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
