Geeking : 664


Off-Topic / Geek / 664	663 \| 665

Subject:	JPEG compression (was: Re: One of the Mindfest pics)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish
Followup-To:	lugnet.publish
Date:	Fri, 29 Oct 1999 03:18:14 GMT
Viewed:	337 times

In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Phillip Ogden writes: > I was a real strong believer in uncompressed (I'm allergic to jpeg > compression). But I have to say, after playing a little with them (and the > D700), I can tolerate the image quality they output at their "best" level > of compression. i.e. least compression, highest quality. ymmv Speaking of JPEG compression, here's a comparison of JPEG (lossy) vs. TIFF (non-lossy) for three images: http://www.lugnet.com/temp/tiff-vs-jpeg/cat.html http://www.lugnet.com/temp/tiff-vs-jpeg/wing.html http://www.lugnet.com/temp/tiff-vs-jpeg/454.html Note: the last of the three pages contains several megabytes of inline images. --Todd

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: JPEG compression (was: Re: One of the Mindfest pics)
Do the cameras offer PNG, which can do 24 bit lossless compression? KL (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.publish)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: One of the Mindfest pics
Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) I was a real strong believer in uncompressed (I'm allergic to jpeg compression). But I have to say, after playing a little with them (and the D700), I can tolerate the image quality they output at their (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

13 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search