Subject:
|
Re: JPEG compression (was: Re: One of the Mindfest pics)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Nov 1999 15:24:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
832 times
|
| |
|
|
You guys may want to check out:
http://www.jpeg.org/public/jpeglinks.htm
and
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/jpeg-faq/
Mike
-----
Mike Faunce
mike at faunce dot com
Kevin Loch <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in message news:FKCHo6.E30@lugnet.com...
> Do the cameras offer PNG, which can do 24 bit lossless compression?
>
> KL
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Todd Lehman writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Phillip Ogden writes:
> > > I was a real strong believer in uncompressed (I'm allergic to jpeg
> > > compression). But I have to say, after playing a little with them (and • the
> > > D700), I can tolerate the image quality they output at their "best" • level
> > > of compression. i.e. least compression, highest quality. ymmv
> >
> > Speaking of JPEG compression, here's a comparison of JPEG (lossy) vs. • TIFF
> > (non-lossy) for three images:
> >
> > http://www.lugnet.com/temp/tiff-vs-jpeg/cat.html
> > http://www.lugnet.com/temp/tiff-vs-jpeg/wing.html
> > http://www.lugnet.com/temp/tiff-vs-jpeg/454.html
> >
> > Note: the last of the three pages contains several megabytes of inline
> > images.
> >
> > --Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
