Subject:
|
Re: JPEG compression (was: Re: One of the Mindfest pics)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 29 Oct 1999 03:28:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
486 times
|
| |
| |
Do the cameras offer PNG, which can do 24 bit lossless compression?
KL
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Phillip Ogden writes:
> > I was a real strong believer in uncompressed (I'm allergic to jpeg
> > compression). But I have to say, after playing a little with them (and the
> > D700), I can tolerate the image quality they output at their "best" level
> > of compression. i.e. least compression, highest quality. ymmv
>
> Speaking of JPEG compression, here's a comparison of JPEG (lossy) vs. TIFF
> (non-lossy) for three images:
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/temp/tiff-vs-jpeg/cat.html
> http://www.lugnet.com/temp/tiff-vs-jpeg/wing.html
> http://www.lugnet.com/temp/tiff-vs-jpeg/454.html
>
> Note: the last of the three pages contains several megabytes of inline
> images.
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|