Subject:
|
Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Oct 1999 21:01:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
666 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> writes:
> [...]
> Another interesting twist on that -- but a different way: A larger, or more
> specific, common thing between us is that we're both *male* geeks. But now
> if one makes the statement, "male geeks aren't very common," then that's
> probably more false than it is true, given the assumptions the listener
> probably makes (that "male geeks" is being compared to "all geeks" rather
> than to "all people").
>
> Oh my. So, which of the following statements is more common-English-true
> than the other?
>
> 1) Male nurses are uncommon.
> 2) Male geeks are uncommon.
>
> Now which of those statements is more Math-true than the other? [...]
I forgot adult LEGO-ness! It's a wonderful opportunity to make a very
confusing and misleading true statment! :) :)
Male adult LEGO fans are quite uncommon.
Hee hee! It's true!! :)
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
30 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
