Subject:
|
Re: my biggest problem with www.lego.com
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Oct 1999 04:12:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
502 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
I too am fully java enabled, have had no technical problems with the site, and
I usually connect at 49999K. I like the site, but you make a very good point.
It is not at all easy for a child visiting the site to find what he wants when
it comes to a specific product. An adult that is a LEGO fan, such as myself,
could probably manage, but a kid, say eight to ten, would have trouble.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | my biggest problem with www.lego.com
|
| I've got fast net to the house, am completely java enabled when I choose to be, and have no technical problems with the site. I gotta say, it looks pretty cool. And I still think it's awful. Larry mentioned the need for cognitive direction for a (...) (25 years ago, 17-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
30 Messages in This Thread: ![Lego.com - new look -James Brown (15-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lego.com - new look -Kevin Wilson (15-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego.com - new look -David Eaton (15-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lego.com - new look -Fredrik Glöckner (15-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lego.com - new look -Alex Roode (16-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Lego.com - new look -Allan Bedford (15-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego.com - new look -Christian Holtje (16-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Disabled unfriendly Lego -Christian Holtje (16-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Disabled unfriendly Lego -Craig Hamilton (16-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Lego.com - new look -Allan Bedford (16-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego.com - new look -Matthew Miller (16-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego.com - new look -Allan Bedford (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lego.com - new look -Matthew Miller (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Todd Lehman (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Allan Bedford (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Matthew Miller (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Todd Lehman (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Todd Lehman (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Matthew Miller (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Matthew Miller (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Todd Lehman (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![(Cancelled)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Todd Lehman (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Matthew Miller (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Larry Pieniazek (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Todd Lehman (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lowest Common Denominator (was: Re: Lego.com - new look) -Matthew Miller (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![my biggest problem with www.lego.com -Remy Evard (17-Oct-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lego.com - new look) -Bram Lambrecht (18-Oct-99 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|