Subject:
|
Re: Lego.com - new look
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 16 Oct 1999 22:41:16 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.NOSPAMorg
|
Viewed:
|
597 times
|
| |
|
|
Allan Bedford <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@execulink.com> wrote:
> site (one for new browsers, one for old) you should ALWAYS design to the
> lowest common denominator. It's just plain rude not to. No, I really
Greatest common denominator, probably.
(You want to design for the highest level that people will have in common.
"Lowest common denominator" is meaningless.)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lego.com - new look
|
| (...) Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in article (...) common. (...) <puzzled grin> I was expecting some contrary comments on my post, but wasn't really expecting a debate on semantics. :) Actually the expression "lowest common (...) (25 years ago, 17-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lego.com - new look
|
| (...) there is (...) the (...) installs. (...) it (...) you (...) of us (...) The Doctor What <docwhat@gerf.org> wrote in article <19991016144608.A171...rf.org>... (...) you (...) This is why... unless you are going to provide multiple versions of (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
