Subject:
|
Re: The Daily Rant
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Jun 1999 15:02:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
419 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999 22:46:52 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote:
> This leads you through an excruciatingly slow and un-intuitive maze of screens
> to get to where you want to go. A prime example of how *NOT* to design a web
> site. The developers/maintainers of this site (Torrington Interactive Ltd.)
> should be taken out and shot. It is really that bad.
> And ultimately, there is no content for Natalie. Truly a pathetic web site.
> I would think that BMG would be embarrassed by this.
BMG has always had a bad online presence. Evidence for the prosecution:
In 1995, they had a presence on CompuServe. The customer service contact
'interface' consisted of a line-based text entry system. The customer was
responsible for entering up to 3, 72-character lines, with correct
placement of line breaks. Made a mistake on a previous line? Too bad. No
backing up.
When they first started their web site, the start page had a huge
(relatively speaking) image-map graphic, which amounted to 'click here to
join' and 'click here if you're a member'. The selection was worse than
what was offered in the monthly mailings (now that makes a lot of sense).
An improved site was promised, but not delivered for several years. During
those years, there were warnings that the site would only work on Netscape
2.0 compatible browsers. I don't know about you, but I'm not down-grading
for anything.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Daily Rant
|
| (...) Her CD has some macromedia junk on it that really pushes to have you install AOL (yeah, right). But here are the website addresses: (URL) this one. Its OK. www.bmg-backstage.co.uk/natalie <-- this one is a dead link. Using: (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
