Debate : Search Results: bruce half irish


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: bruce half irish

Results 581 – 600 of about 1900.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Oh I love it when people say that others don't understand... throw the argeuement into question by alluding to ignorance or incompotence... nicely done. I'm well aware of the evolution of the laws. I'm also aware of the ability to strike and (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: THIS is why this whole war is a waste of time.
(...) I think Bush tells himself what he wants to hear and then convinces himself that it is true. "To thine own self be true, and it must follow, as the night the day, thou cannot be false to any man." Perhaps you are reacting to his own deception (...) (21 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: Hotel Palestine
(...) Post it here, but I believe that I have seen the video on CNN - they were showing it, but running on about something else. Tank shoots building. Pretty straightforward and undeniable. (...) (strategic snipping of my own comments to string this (...) (21 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) lol what I meant was that his question was completely specious to the topic:-) (...) I don't like statistics based on race because I think that they generalize in a way that is unhealthy. We are all Americans. What purpose is there to (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) So there are similarities to George W Bush and Kim Jong? With all due respect, you don't know what the hell you are talking about. (...) I'm sorry, Dave, but it is moronic to compare the two. It is such a stupid idea that it requires no (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: THIS is why this whole war is a waste of time.
(...) And Dubya can have his brother appointed governor of Iraq, and have the Florida election commision make sure that those he doesn't want having ballots don't get them or.... We can trade zingers, Scott, but the real point is do you believe Bush (...) (21 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: THIS is why this whole war is a waste of time.
(...) from the article: "With a long career centered mostly in the Middle East, administration officials describe (Barbara) Bodine as an Arabist who favors traditional, "stable" Arab regimes - the kind where democracy does not flourish." Note that (...) (21 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: Hotel Palestine
(...) option with the exceedingly long lag delays. Neither the story nor the video. The video would only be conclusive if it showed the whole incident from start to finish, not just the moment of firing. (...) Regarding reports: see what I mean? (...) (21 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: Poetry Hit 'n' Run #1
(...) If it isn't on television it can't be real, can it, now? Oh wait, what if it just had a web-site...would that count? -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: Hotel Palestine
(...) Tanks are not necessarily buttoned up (hatches closed with the crew inside). I don't know the current tactical doctrine on whether the commander stays exposed for greater visibilty or trusts to the optics and air-conditioning of the tank or (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: It's scarier if he actually believes his own nonsense.
(...) No! Really? And you think I would have known that with those really obvious question marks at the ends of the lines! ;-) There were those in Britain that wanted to believe that (whether they actually believed it I couldn't say). I only quote (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: It's scarier if he actually believes his own nonsense.
(...) And did those feet in ancient time Walk upon England's mountains green? And was the holy Lamb of God On England's pleasant pastures seen? Not to that extent. :-) Of course, all the nutcases left Britain (were urged towards the exit) and came (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: It's scarier if he actually believes his own nonsense.
(...) Idunno, is Britain a more secular society? Not officially of course, the state and the church are the same vs. separation of church and state, but in practice? Many do want that "God Bless America", but in Britain some like to think that God (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.442)

		Re: Now, you have to read this ! How stupid can one get?
(...) Haha! J'ai voté dans le hall minifig de gloire juste à la rancune lui! Faucon Noir! J'en ai environ 100 un. Yes, I know, it's fractured, but what do you expect for an on-line auto-translator? -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.441)

		Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
(...) IN RELATION to what Dave said!!! "Recent evidence suggests that the Emperor was about to surrender." You keep taking it out of context and trying to assert your own argument in there. (...) "...about to surrender"??? Nope. (...) "...about to (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.441)

		Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
(...) They didn't accept the call for unconditional surrender, war was continuing. I'm not sure why you aren't getting it, and I'm kinda tired of having to repeat it. (...) Go back to what Dave wrote: "recent evidence suggests that the Emperor was (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.441)

		Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
(...) 1: I read the site before I posted, and for that matter I read the site the previous time this came up. You may wish to actually quote the exact passage that you are refering to, since what I read would seem to support me. 2: Unsupported (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.441)

		Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
(...) Quite the contrary - see your quoted summary at the bottom. Japan had rejected the conditions of surrender (to whit, none) and the U.S. was under no obligation to pause in the war. In fact, it would have been a betrayal of the American people (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.441)

		Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
(...) Oh no! Not the "should we have dropped 'the bomb'" debate again?!? No, despite lame attempts at recent revisionism, we had no way to know what Japan intended beyond its action (which were that the war was going to continue to the absolute (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.441)

		Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
(...) I assume that you are discounting the two blaringly obvious examples for a reason? Germany? Japan? The latter we did literally bomb into submission (WoMD, to add some irony). (...) That we have committed this far (foolishly) it would seem a (...) (22 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.441)

More: Next Page >>