To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21197
21196  |  21198
Subject: 
Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 12 Jun 2003 05:41:55 GMT
Viewed: 
707 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:

  
   What’s the number one cause of death for a black male in America b/w ages 18 and 34?

Besides being completely specious, I am no racist and therefore have no time for racist statistics.

I take it what you meant to write and what you actually wrote are two different things. If you are completely specious, then that means you denial of being a racist is specious, therefore...

lol what I meant was that his question was completely specious to the topic:-)
  
Teases about unintended sentence structure aside, I think “racist” is a word tossed around too lightly at times, even if technically accurate (Terry’s follow-up). But when you dismiss the statistics out of hand without even hearing what they are, you are saying that you have prejudged them. You don’t like the conclusion that can be drawn by whatever you suppose were the statistics? Because they don’t fit your own preconceived notions? Because they are inaccurate? Because they are are misleading (lies, damn lies, and statistics)?

I don’t like statistics based on race because I think that they generalize in a way that is unhealthy. We are all Americans. What purpose is there to categorize by race? And what do you do with such statistics anyway? What is the #1 killer of American black men between the ages of 18 and 34? Of 17 and 33? Is it any more relevant than Hispanic men statistics? What about “whites”? I think it is the statisticians who create such statistics in order to fit their own preconceived notions to advance some agenda.

   You have to understand that there are pat, practiced, prepared answers that idealogues (left and right, up and down) have. They are the kind of stock thinking that you make use of a lot. I try not to take the sometimes hostile attitude that some others have to you because some how, some way, I don’t think you are a bad person at all.

That’s because you are a very perceptive person, -->Bruce<--;-)


   You just have imposed a very narrow way of thinking upon yourself. I keep hoping that you will expand your vision some day.

I may come off as a right wing ideologue, but I think I am a little more open-minded then I apparently come off. Actually, it might surprise you to learn that I started off a very liberal kollege student! Perhaps it is just my getting more conservative in my old age:-)

JOHN



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
 
John, if this is true, I definitely do NOT want you as President when you hit your 50s - you already spout such narrow-minded ideas here, I'd hate to see you get even more conservative. (Luckily I know that in person you seem to be a completely (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
 
(...) How so? I don't happen to agree with the conclusion being drawn, or at least implied, (that we are either as bad or almost as bad as DPRK... as if!) but the large number of incarcerations among the underclass strikes me as a sign of oppression (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
 
(...) I take it what you meant to write and what you actually wrote are two different things. If you are completely specious, then that means you denial of being a racist is specious, therefore... Teases about unintended sentence structure aside, I (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR