|
| |
|  
bruce
(score: 1.301)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.301)
|
|
 | | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
| (...) A good point with a debatable example. (...) Another good point, but it misses to a degree. People turn to violence when they feel disenfranchised for whatever reason - the Latasha Harlin/Rodney King one-two punch resulted in riots in Los (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.301)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Yes and no. "Coloured" (sic: colored <g>) is a really poor term that isn't particularly used in America. It carries the implication that europeans are "normal" and others are not. In the sense Larry meant it, I agree. But in the sense that you (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Yup, that's pretty much it - and let me add that I don't regard the Libertarian Party as a white supremacist group in the slightest. I'd said what I did in part because I think the Libertarian Party *for it's own benefit* needs to address the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) *Some* did. Note the first one listed here: (URL) I'm sure you know that businesses that *wanted* to discriminate were behind those laws - typifying all businesses in these states as innocent victims isn't exactly accurate. My point was that (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Four messages back from the one I'm typing now. You haven't seen a demonstration of how this is detrimental?!? Did you miss the reasons for the civil rights movement? Ensuing riots in reaction to racism? I pointed out earlier that you get that (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) It would seem to me that you don't think it particularly important is an illustration of the problem. (...) And long term detriments may not be visible to all the Libertarian Party members. I did give a specific example (Libertarians allowing (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Thanks - I just never connect the initials to the group. :-) (...) It's a pretty good analogy that isn't quite right. Libertarians tend to be white, male, and middle-to-upper-middle class. That isn't rich. Shouldn't the rich be Libertarians if (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) South Coast Liesure Club? Sunny California Libertarian Clique? Advanced Ideas Mechanics? Accuracy in Media? Asian Internet Marketing? I don't speak initial. Well, solved the second with my Apache buddy literally walking by as I was typing (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) This is one of my problems with the Libertarian Party. All that sounded good on paper. I like it...in theory. Unfortunately, it's doubtful that it will happen in reality. Businesses are all too often focused on the *now*, the next quarter, (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Well no wonder you feel disenfranchised - the American people rejected Dubya both on a majority and plurality base, and he's still the president. :-( But on a greater level, you feel disenfranchised because the political philosophy you support (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) I pointed out the real difference between your two examples - you consistently refuse to address it. (...) The scenario in regards to Jim Crow is the state government gave you an excuse to allow the segregated busing you wanted (you not being (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: Nothing personal, but...
|
| (...) I think you missed James' point - you can't control Larry, you can only control yourself. I need to remind myself of this all the time. :-) Bruce (ooooo, sorry, that was a dig at myself, not Larry!) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: boulders on shoulders
|
| (...) It's easier to mock than say something substantive, I suppose. Let me note I never said I had superior knowledge of what it's like to be a woman. Anyway, here's some more rope - you're just proving the title of this string. Bruce (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| | Re: boulders on shoulders
|
| (...) Dang, am I getting your post mixed up with Duane's? Did I count the arrows incorrectly? Sorry if I did. I'm running under the Teddy Roosevelt Bullmoose banner! You heard it here first! Contributions accepted. Cash only, don't expect receipts. (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.300)
|
