To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10902
10901  |  10903
Subject: 
Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:32:15 GMT
Viewed: 
995 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:

Since I share Bruce's misgivings on this subject, I'll mention a few
thoughts, too.  The validity or invalidity of the LP's views is, of course,
wholly independent of the racial, cultural, age, or gender makeup of the
party, but that's not what Bruce appears (to me) to be disputing.  My
feeling, and the feeling of many others, is that the message of the group is
apparently favorable to white males if white males are the principal
proponents of the message.  If, as the LP press packet indicates, the
Libertarian agenda is truly the best plan for every man, woman, and child,
then why is it that only white males latch onto it?  If the problem is
simply one of exposure (which I do not believe to be the case), then the LP
needs to make its presence known so that the non-white-male populace can see
the benefits of the party.
I suspect that Bruce isn't simply dismissing the LP's platform as a white
supremacist construct; he has noted its shortcomings and sees in those
shortcomings something that the white male constituency identifies as
expressly beneficial to them.  The supposition is that, if it were the
greatest good for all, then all would be eager to join.

    Dave!

Yup, that's pretty much it - and let me add that I don't regard the
Libertarian Party as a white supremacist group in the slightest.  I'd said
what I did in part because I think the Libertarian Party *for it's own
benefit* needs to address the issue of why they are so heavily white male.

Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Libertarian Propaganda (was incorrectly referred to as SPAM elsewhere in the thread)
 
(...) Let's stipulate that, for the sake of discussion. What can be done? Or that is, how far can the LP go? Remember that the LP is the "Party of Principle". A lot of big internal spats happen because some action or message is proposed which seems (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) Since I share Bruce's misgivings on this subject, I'll mention a few thoughts, too. The validity or invalidity of the LP's views is, of course, wholly independent of the racial, cultural, age, or gender makeup of the party, but that's not what (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR