Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 3881 – 3900 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: A New Threat
FUT: lugnet.off-topic.debate (...) It's all in the terminology: ref. 'War On Drugs' - by inference, war is ok, drugs are not. And remember, this is a time of war. We want to bring up kids that will fight and kill, but not ask why. Allister (21 years ago, 1-Apr-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.314)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Dave Schuler wrote in message ... (...) in (...) family) (...) If no one wanted to help them, then how in heck do we end up with a law helping them? Who passed the law in the first place if no one wanted to help them? I really doubt ANYONE (no (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.314)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Frank Filz wrote in message <387CEFEB.6799@minds...ng.com>... (...) thought (...) thing (...) more (...) Red Cross was a pretty dumb organization to pick, but there are plenty of others, and the idea that "we'd" fight wars for non political reasons (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.314)

		Re: Libitarian guff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Long and boring, yet plenty controversial... Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) library, (...) were (...) set (...) that (...) not (...) Why not? Those who can climb out of the "mines" will. Those who can't are a monkey on the world's back (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.314)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Dave Schuler wrote in message ... (...) "responsibility" (...) then? (...) from (...) fiscal (...) wealthy (...) Because man. There would be other rich people, who make money off of poorer people by suing the hell out of rich people or corporations (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.314)

		Anti-Bush Liberal US Media - Proof at last!
(URL) Anti-Bush US Media?> Tyler Crotty, a 13-year-old from Florida, has whipped up a surprisingly big storm in the US, considering that all he did was yawn. Fatefully, though, Tyler chose to express his overwhelming sense of tedium - yawning, (...) (21 years ago, 3-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.314)

		Re: Reuters: "Oregon County Bans All Marriages - Period"
(...) amendment. "Congress shall make no law respecting any establishment of relgion, nor prophibiting the free exercise thereof..." -Mike Petrucelli (21 years ago, 25-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.313)

		Re: Sheikh Yassin
(...) All? It's just a wild guess. Of course both sides of a war will present arguments saying they're right, so they won't be of much help. Wars usually begin once conflicting interests can no longer be settled thru diplomatic channels, which are (...) (21 years ago, 24-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.313)

		Reuters: "Oregon County Bans All Marriages - Period"
I found this interesting... (URL) (21 years ago, 25-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.313)

		Re: Another horrific story out of Fallujah
(...) Cash in, and make another movie? ;) Thankfully, I only saw censored pictures of what happened. A few people died yesterday, and that is upsetting to both me and you. However, you should note that a great deal of innocent civilians have been (...) (21 years ago, 1-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.313)

		Re: Sheikh Yassin
"Pedro Silva" <el_gordo@netc.pt> wrote in message news:Hv3IF7.BuF@lugnet.com... (...) old (...) terrorism: "act (...) Hmm, by that definition, almost all acts of war are acts of terrorism. It is not practical in a military action to eliminate all (...) (21 years ago, 24-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.313)

		Re: Of some interest
(...) (URL) Here's> some more to think about: Frist, Goss, and Hastert have always shown themselves to be decent, honest servants of-- I'm sorry, I can't type that with a straight face. So here's my prediction: The 2003 testimony will not be (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.313)

		Re: FOUND: Weapons of Mass Destruction
(...) But if they'd posed a threat to, say, Cuba instead of to the United States, would they have been arrested at all? And, anyway, that's not the point. All day, every day, we're bombarded with so-called "breaking news" reports about the latest (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.313)

		Re: Sheikh Yassin
(...) I wasn't actually saying that at all, although I'd happily agree that you could a sense of moral equivalence. But I wasn't commenting on your odd morality, or even the American revived doctrine of pre-emptive self-defense. I was simply (...) (21 years ago, 25-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.313)

		Re: Sheikh Yassin
(...) The right wing Israeli group Ateret Cohanim “is the spiritual focus for the return of Jews to their homes in the "Moslem" (once known as the Mixed) Quarter.” (i.e. this group, supported by Sharon, is engaged in ethnic cleansing). Where does it (...) (21 years ago, 31-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.313)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) More questions I'm afraid :) Using this premise, does the child have a right to expect an education from their parents? And if the parents default on that duty - would the child suffer? (As I understand it, one of a Libertarian state's duties (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.313)

		Re: Terrorists hate freedom
(...) First off, let's not assume that those detained are "innocent". They all were captured fighting against our forces. When I said "all of the facts aren't in", I meant that I didn't possess all of the facts in order to comment-- and neither does (...) (21 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.313)

		Re: FOUND: Weapons of Mass Destruction
(...) First of all, nobody with the knowledge of what they were up to was "allowing" them to live in the US. As soon as they were discovered, they were arrested. (...) Is this last part meant as a joke? Are you inferring some sort of aspersion on (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.313)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) Yes, we saw this in the 19th century coal-mine towns a lot. Isn't it more in corporations' interest to teach people that they have no rights, that they should submit to the will of The Company? (...) People may be inherently good, but there's (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.313)

		Re: Yet another push for thoughtful legislation from Tennessee
(...) Look, all I am saying is that if one is going to preach tolerance (read: pluralists), than be tolerant in all circumstances, not merely when it serves one's agendas. (...) There is no justification for it, except to say that everyone has the (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.313)

More: Next Page >>