Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 9 Jan 2000 22:33:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
976 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Blowing all your money on bass boats and not having any to spend on your
> kids education is neglecting your fiduciary duty to your ward (a child
> is a minor and you are beholden to it, you decided to bring it into the
> world, until he or she is old enough to fend for him or herself) which
> might get you some jail time, in Libertopia.
>
> The STATE doesn't owe you an education. Your parents do.
More questions I'm afraid :)
Using this premise, does the child have a right to expect an education from
their parents? And if the parents default on that duty - would the child
suffer? (As I understand it, one of a Libertarian state's duties is to prevent
individuals violating the rights of others)
If the state sends the child to school without having paid fees then is that
child given the debt to repay later, is it given to the parents or would the
state pay for the fees?
If the Libertarian state allowed the child to go without education then that
child is more likely to grow up into someone who won't be able to afford to
send their children to school either. Dangerous Catch 22..
Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
