To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3535
3534  |  3536
Subject: 
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:57:18 GMT
Viewed: 
1184 times
  
Dave Schuler wrote in message ...
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Miller writes:
John DiRienzo <ig88888888@stlnet.com> wrote:
town on that.  In the Libertopia, its not the corporations' • "responsibility"
to fund education, but the peoples' (such as parents of children).  Some

What happens when you have bad parents? (Such things happen. Especially if
we're allowing companies to sell crack....) Whose responsibility is it • then?
Or do those kids just not get an education? How're they supposed to end up
as good parents themselves, then? It seems like this leads to some sort of
caste system!

Not at all! ;-)
  It simply guarantees that those who have money, be they individuals or
corporations, will continute to have money and the best that it can buy, • from
education to property (which could thereupon be protected by these nebulous
"property rights").  And why shouldn't they?  Since they have money and • fiscal
power, naturally we can rely on them to behave responsibly and not to take
unfair advantage of it!

    Dave!


Why shouldn't we expect that, given the chance, every corporation and • wealthy
individual will work very hard to ensure that no one else can usurp


   Because man.  There would be other rich people, who make money off of
poorer people by suing the hell out of rich people or corporations for
usurping their rights.  It happens now.  The idea is to decongest the courts
for actual violations of contracts than the crap you see in courts these
days.  Of course rich people will do what is in their power to have the
upper hand, but thats how it is now, and the current government itself helps
them out a hell of a lot in that regard.  You think your taxes are helping
the poor, you imbecile (1), when they are helping the rich far more.

1 - no offense, but if you didn't act like one, it wouldn't need to be said.
--
   Have fun!
   John
The Legos you've been dreaming of...
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego
my weird Lego site:
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) It's an interesting idea, but the legal companies you mention that thrive upon such cases are not likely to make the courts any less decongested. It's not even almost in their interest. (...) That's 2 times in 7 minutes - both times I've been (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) Not at all! ;-) It simply guarantees that those who have money, be they individuals or corporations, will continute to have money and the best that it can buy, from education to property (which could thereupon be protected by these nebulous (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR