Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 21:51:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1236 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Miller writes:
> John DiRienzo <ig88888888@stlnet.com> wrote:
> > town on that. In the Libertopia, its not the corporations' "responsibility"
> > to fund education, but the peoples' (such as parents of children). Some
>
> What happens when you have bad parents? (Such things happen. Especially if
> we're allowing companies to sell crack....) Whose responsibility is it then?
> Or do those kids just not get an education? How're they supposed to end up
> as good parents themselves, then? It seems like this leads to some sort of
> caste system!
Not at all! ;-)
It simply guarantees that those who have money, be they individuals or
corporations, will continute to have money and the best that it can buy, from
education to property (which could thereupon be protected by these nebulous
"property rights"). And why shouldn't they? Since they have money and fiscal
power, naturally we can rely on them to behave responsibly and not to take
unfair advantage of it!
Dave!
Why shouldn't we expect that, given the chance, every corporation and wealthy
individual will work very hard to ensure that no one else can usurp
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
