Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1441 – 1460 of about 12000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Separation of Church and State
(URL) which granite tablets inscribed with the 10 commandments were removed from school property. Is this separation or liberalism run amok? I dunno. If, say, I was a teacher at this school, and I had a card with the 10 commandments on my desk, is (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

property
(score: 0.546)

		Re: Possession
(...) Do IP rights have to be bought the way they are now? The reason this library idea is very cool is because it follows the law of today, yet gets more media to more people...right? Why not just set up this giant media database but charge (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.545)

		Newsbits: Distortion of evidence, Faith Bias (as if we didn't know)
Chief U.N. inspectors criticizes U.S. for insisting Iraq has weapons (URL) "It is sort of puzzling I think that you can have 100 per cent certainty about the weapons of mass destruction's existence, and zero certainty about where they are," he said. (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.545)

		Re: Should we be concerned?
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) Totally on the same page with John--driving's a priviledge, not a right, and getting a drivers license, as it stands today in many areas, is getting your picture taken such that when and if (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

property
(score: 0.545)

		Re: Yahoo Sucks
(...) Is that against their ToS? It sounds like you believe that it actually is. (...) What 1st amendment rights are you referring to in this context? (...) Is this in accordance with their documented process? (...) Lost forever? You have no backups (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.544)

		Re: Orrin Hatch: Software Pirate?
(...) Arrrrr, but where would we be wi'out Robert Newton's scenery-chewin' iconic pyrate performance, ya swab! Pronouncin' our Rs as Hs like some dandified lubber, 'stead of pronouncing 'em so far back in our throats that we near swallow 'em, that's (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.544)

		Possession
Hey Y'all: I have some scenarios for you... I just bought a VHS tape on eBay of "Neo-Tokyo" (a compilation of 3 animated shorts). Now it looks as if the seller is MIA and me with no tape. Do I own it already, or not until I specifically take (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.544)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) I think I will agree with Lar+ here. -but, I don't think we (Dave and myself) are going to convert any of you...you percive a need to have a security blanket, that we feel is unneeded, and unwarrented. As long as we are free to talk about it, (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.544)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) I was looking for a spot to jump in to this debate too, and I don't know if this is it, but what the heck I will butt in anyway. I know and understand the Jeffersonian arguement that citizens need to be armed against an oppressive government, (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.544)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Again with the "Jeffersonian" speak. I would point out that Jefferson livd 200+ years ago and some of the ideas from that time may not be valid today. Again (and again and again) it is your national forces that's protecting your 'freedom and (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.544)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Assuming that you don't infringe on other's rights (as I gather from your last comment). (...) Do you assert the right to have society pay to put you back together again, humpty dumpty? Just wondering. JOHN (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.544)

		Re: Revisionists...
(...) When I talk about impeachment I talk about lying to a grand jury in front of a federal judge; I talk about if it should be alright for a sitting president to commit a felony and not be prosecuted; I talk about obvious obstruction of justice. (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.544)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) I guess when it gets to the details, there's the rub: "socially acceptable." There's a lot of stuff that gets wrap up with that that itself has nothing to do with whether one obeys the laws or not. In the U.S., it used to be thought that one (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.544)

		Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy)
(...) Right on. I have a brother in law who has exhibited enough cluelessness and consequence avoidance that he's on the verge of being written off. (...) Right on. Key difference here. If you don't get it, re-read. Rights are about behaviours. Even (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 0.543)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) How about peace and love instead of bombing other countries? Last time I checked, freedom diodn't mean you're free to bomb Irak if you please and liberty didn't mean you have the liberty meant something more than limiting individual rights to (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.543)

		"Terrorism" is just a scapegoat.
I was discussing the whole gun control thing with someone today. That person made a comment along the lines of, "what good will small arms do against a modern military." My reply was, "I don't know ask the PLO, IRA, Veit-Cong, or any other group (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.543)

		Re: Your Rights, Your Money...
(...) This is a debate forum-- perhaps try your luck in .fun, or .tiredliberalpropoganda... JOHN (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.542)

		Re: Your Rights, Your Money...
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote: snip (...) That statement is patently false! It comes from the rich's own pocket! Get your facts straight, you socialist in sheep's clothing. (...) Tax Credit = $$$ give away. Explain to me why I (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.542)

		Re: Your Rights, Your Money...
(...) Yes. If anyone cares to track it back, I posted about this some weeks ago -- esp. the offshore corporation scam. I repeat, corporations are granted special benefits as fictitious persons because they are supposed to provide a public good in (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.542)

		Re: Your Rights, Your Money...
(...) That's very nearly a 100% apocryphal statistic. Here's one addressing of the issue: (URL) but there countless others on the web and in print media that draw pretty much the same conclusion. I'm not worried about my Canadian friends who (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.542)

More: Next Page >>