Subject:
|
Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 22:37:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
133 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim Culberson <t_c_c@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3A806AF4.C5570BA0@yahoo.com...
> Ross Crawford wrote:
> >
> > Check out
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/dave_matson/young-earth/specific_argu
> > ments/
>
> Thank you Ross. This citation is the most direct refutation you could
> have found :)...and since I don't have any counter-refutations myself,
> I'm not going to argue it :)
>
> Please note that this does not, however, mean that I believe it or admit
> that I'm wrong, just that I don't intend to research a counter-refute
> presently and that yes, for the time being you have shown my particular
> arguments incorrect. I am willing to ay that there are most likely
> counter-arguments out there that I would agree with if I knew what they
> were, but I don't.
Just as my quoting the above site doesn't mean I agree entirely with
everything there. But there are some very good references!
Regards,
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
| (...) Thank you Ross. This citation is the most direct refutation you could have found :)...and since I don't have any counter-refutations myself, I'm not going to argue it :) Please note that this does not, however, mean that I believe it or admit (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
