Subject:
|
Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:21:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
130 times
|
| |
|
|
Ross Crawford wrote:
>
> Check out
> http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/dave_matson/young-earth/specific_argu
> ments/
Thank you Ross. This citation is the most direct refutation you could
have found :)...and since I don't have any counter-refutations myself,
I'm not going to argue it :)
Please note that this does not, however, mean that I believe it or admit
that I'm wrong, just that I don't intend to research a counter-refute
presently and that yes, for the time being you have shown my particular
arguments incorrect. I am willing to ay that there are most likely
counter-arguments out there that I would agree with if I knew what they
were, but I don't.
> Guess so 8?)
Well briefly :)
--
-TiM
NB, CA
http://echofx.itgo.com
t_c_c@yahoo.com
3ch0fx
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
| Tim Culberson <t_c_c@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3A806AF4.C5570B...hoo.com... (...) (URL) > ments/ (...) Just as my quoting the above site doesn't mean I agree entirely with everything there. But there are some very good references! Regards, (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
| Tim Culberson <t_c_c@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3A7F69BB.27714E...hoo.com... (...) Check out (URL) these arguments and many more creationist arguments are refuted (with references). (...) Guess so 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
