Subject:
|
Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:26:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
114 times
|
| |
|
|
Mr L F Braun wrote:
>
> > Despite claims that all evidence points to a multi-billion year old
> > earth and that a 6000 year old one is impossible, that simply isn't
> > true. There is evidence to support a young earth that interestingly
> > enough "fits" perfectly with the creation record. Below are three
> > examples:
>
> Just because something fits timewise doesn't make it so.
I'd just like to clarify that I never said that at all, but you rather
assumed that's what I meant. I did say "interestingly enough".
Just one response to this message (see my reply to Ross's message for
why I didn't respond to the others)
--
-TiM
NB, CA
http://echofx.itgo.com
t_c_c@yahoo.com
3ch0fx
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
| (...) I'll point to the talk.origins clearinghouse site, which is one of the best catch-all refutations of the Creationist argument (and exploration of misconceptions about Evolution that cause otherwise intelligent people to subscribe to Creation (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
