Subject:
|
Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:32:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
187 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Culberson writes:
> > Ross Crawford wrote:
> > >
> > > Check out
> > > http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/dave_matson/young-earth/specific_arguments/
> >
> > Thank you Ross. This citation is the most direct refutation you could
> > have found :)...and since I don't have any counter-refutations myself,
> > I'm not going to argue it :)
That's an excellent point-by-point clearinghouse (with some
cross-links to the talk.origins site I posted, as well).
Thanks for posting it, Ross.
> And here's a couple of late-breaking stories which seem to contradict the idea
> of a "young world":
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1158000/1158419.stm
!!! That's rather spiffy news.
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1157000/1157536.stm
Did anyone else notice that the bottom picture in the
article is the singularly most unflattering "official"
photograph ever taken of a person? It would be one
thing to have one's eyes shut *or* one's tongue out,
but both at the same time...!
best
LFB
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
