Subject:
|
Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:07:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
150 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
>
> > An Evolutionist believes that all life originated from a common ancestor
> > and evolved over a very large amount of time (at least several billion
> > years from what I understand).
>
> They lean to that theory, but it isn't a definite thing.
Well it's nice that you bring that up....what is it about evolution that
you DO believe exactly?
> And? I won't even bother with arguing your numbers. You have no point, in
> case you haven't noticed.
>
>
> Again, you don't seem to realize you have absolutely no point, beyond you
> clearly don't understand tidal forces.
Jeepers Bruce! At least Ross showed me where I could find
counter-arguments! Not only do you not cite a source you just throw a
couple general "yeah-whatevers" at me without even giving a brief
explanation as to why my statements were wrong.....you call that debate?
> > Anyone want to continue this endless debate :)?
>
> That depends on how far Creationists want to bury their heads in the sand
> and shout, "I'm not listening!"
Clearly not far enough yet seeing as you still replied! If you don't
say WHY what I've said is incorrect you're not real debating, you're
mostly just throwing out blind accusations.
--
-TiM
NB, CA
http://echofx.itgo.com
t_c_c@yahoo.com
3ch0fx
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
| (...) I'm neither into biochemistry or microbiology, so I have no great opinion on the matter. Or were you refering to evolution in general? (...) Look at your statements: they don't say that anything is impossible - simply put, they do not argue (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth.
|
| (...) This has been shot full of holes centuries ago when they found chinese genealogies going back further than 4004 BC. I've mentioned this before. Europeans were scratching their heads about this almost 400 years ago - why can't Creationists get (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
24 Messages in This Thread: ![Support for a 'young' earth. -Tim Culberson (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Ross Crawford (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Tim Culberson (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Ross Crawford (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Ross Crawford (7-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Lindsay Frederick Braun (8-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Markus Wolf (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Tim Culberson (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Dave Low (7-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Markus Wolf (9-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Dave Schuler (9-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Dave Low (10-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Markus Wolf (10-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Dave Low (10-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Bruce Schlickbernd (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Bruce Schlickbernd (7-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Lucas Thompson (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Lindsay Frederick Braun (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Bruce Schlickbernd (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Lindsay Frederick Braun (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Arnold Staniczek (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Tim Culberson (6-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Support for a 'young' earth. -Dave Low (7-Feb-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|